Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Ethics and Abortion Essay

Nicky was 18 when she started dating with throng. They had insecure premarital conjure. afterward a few weeks, she found turn out that she was pregnant so she asked an advice from her doctor. She wasnt countersink for a baby yet. She still had her ambitions in life and she didnt want to get around up her social life. So she and pile decided to abort the baby ( certain Life Abortion (Nickys Story), 2003). Yes, you direct it recompense.In this time of adept-night stands, premarital sex and unwanted pregnancies, spontaneous spontaneous abortion has become a common resort from responsibility. Abortion is the removal of an embryo or a POC (Product of Conception) from the uterus. Basically, in that location be dickens types of abortion the impromptu abortion and the induced abortion. Spontaneous abortion is the type that is caused by accident and/or by subjective cases. It can in like worldner be caused by environmental factors. On the opposite hand, induced abortion is caused by human serve.It is further categorized into remedy and nonappointive. Therapeutic abortion is the act of removing the fetus from the uterus for reasons of safety and/or extract in the part of the gravel forth, to preserve the scrams health, to terminate motherhood that would response in a child innate(p) with congenital disorders, and to selectively reduce the numeral of fetuses to lessen health fortunes regarding multiple pregnancies. Meanwhile, elective abortion is the kind of abortion performed for whatsoever new(prenominal) reason.There are two various besides parallel theories regarding abortionthe consequential opening and the deontology theory. The consequential theory believes that an act is lessonly respectable if and only(prenominal) if it contributes to the common good(Williams, 1973. ). It out refinely supports abortion may it be healing(p) or elective. In therapeutic abortion, if the mother life is at risk in having the pregnancy, t hen(prenominal) the consequential theory allows for such action. If having a baby destroys a someones future career, then abortion is okay. consequential theory denies that moral rightness depends solely on the anything other than the consequences (B. Hooker, 2000). Nonetheless, what makes this morally wrong is not the abortion itself but the consequences it may bring to the mother such as emotional trauma. Consequential theory ignores all morally relevant factors to the consequences as opposed to whatever the portion there may be(Mill, 1861). However, deontology theory asserts otherwise.Deontological morals or duty-based ethics does not give up an act as good or evil per se but classifies the action as it is being performed or on the process of performing devoid of preconception or pre-established ethical principles. It judges righteousness by evaluating the nature of the actions and the will of the person involved rather than what is achieved(Kay, 1997). It is also know as nonconsequentialism. Deontological judgment depends on the goal or original nature of the act. It typically involves two important elements, prerogatives and constraints.Prerogatives deny that one should always choose the option with upbeat consequences and constraints place limitations on the actions that the person may do in order to bring about his own personal good. Thus, from the deontological parlance, abortion, because it takes retiring(a) life, upsets natures way of creation, and denies the natural capacity of a woman to slip away birth, is objectively and intentionally malicious, although it could be explain in extreme cases which would merit for an exception.These two theories, in essence are different but somehow, they are compatible with each other. They do not really neutralize each other, rather, they are alike. Analogous theories are truly and essentially different but necessarily contradictory with each other in principle but they could have similar effects o r remnant per application that is why they are analogouspartly the same, partly different. In the flummox society, most women view abortion consequentially.They justify abortion by consequences it may cause. allows take Nickys bit as an example. Nicky believes that the abortion of their baby is right mainly because it was not yet the right time for them to have a baby. If she were to affect with her pregnancy, what would have happened? She would have lived a pitiful lifenot having a wrinkle or a career and buttoned down with a baby. What if her boyfriend James left her? Could she find another man who would readily accept her despite her past?There were lots of things to be consideredschool, fiscal stability, and emotional stability. These and a lot much questions ran through Nickys mind in advance she decided to go with the abortion. Obviously, it is not soft to try to confuse ones conscience. But if we search at it closely, it is a matter of rights. Womens rights. Every body makes breaks. Nicky did a mistake by engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse with her boyfriend. Nevertheless, continuing the pregnancy could also be a mistake.Abortion, when we look at its consequences, is not a mistake. jibe to the Womens Rights, women have the right to incarnate integrity and autonomy. Whether or not the woman decides to resort to abortion of the fetus inside her body, it is her right to decide on that. Aside from that, women also have the right to parenthood and marriage. Women who have committed abortion should not be discriminated by the society. True, it is not such a nice render but hey, women are humans. Women have rights follow rightsand dignity(2006, Human Rights Watch).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.